Login
YoutubeTwitterFacebook
05 August 2014
Devolution architect dismisses offer of more powers for Scotland as 'desperate bribe'

The chief architect of devolution today dismissed the 'offer' of more powers for Scotland in return for a No vote on September 18 as a 'desperate bribe' by the anti-independence parties.

Canon Kenyon Wright, who chaired the Scottish Constitutional Convention which laid the groundwork for the re-establishment of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, warned voters not to be taken in by parties that fought hard to keep a 'more powers' option off the referendum ballot paper.

He said: 'David Cameron and his establishment colleagues could have done this long ago. Like many, I argued  for a second question offering a middle way - which I saw not as devolution but as “constitutionally secure autonomy within a reformed UK”. That door was slammed shut - but not by Scotland.
 
'So Messrs Cameron, Miliband and Clegg cannot be surprised if I now see independence as the only way left open, to give Scotland power over her own affairs that is both complete and secure. Their way offers neither.'
 
Canon Wright, a retired Episcopalian clergyman, added: 'The latest “offer” of more powers from the unionist parties looks suspiciously like a rather desperate bribe - but it is not an answer to Scotland’s needs.

'The central issue at stake in the referendum is simple: Where should the ultimate power to make decisions that affect the lives of people in Scotland lie – at Westminster or in Scotland?

'As I should know, devolution - however “max” it may be - is not the way, for two fundamental reasons. First, devolution is incomplete.  It leaves vital areas directly under the control of Westminster. Take just one example of many - if  the UK, as seems more and more likely,  leaves the EU, Scotland will be dragged out too, at great cost.  

'Second, devolution is insecure. The wording of today’s "offer" is very revealing. It indicates that greater powers would be “granted to Scotland”. Granted indeed? By whom?

'Scotland’s history is marked by Claims of Right, all of which rejected as a matter of Right the powers claimed by the “Crown in Parliament” to decide for Scotland.

'Devolution is power, not as a right, but by gift – or more accurately by loan, since gifts can’t usually be taken back. Westminster would retain the permanent power to grant, alter, or rescind. Devolution leaves the UK as a whole fundamentally unreformed.'
 
Blair Jenkins, Chief Executive of Yes Scotland, echoed Canon Wright's remarks. He said: 'The fact that the anti-independence party leaders have come together at this late stage in the debate with this "offer" shows they are losing the campaign and the arguments.

'By making more vague offers of more powers for Scotland, the No parties have been forced onto our ground. However, as Canon Wright underlines, the only way to guarantee all the powers that Scotland wants and needs to become a better and fairer country is with a Yes vote.'
 

sitemap | cookie policy | privacy policy | accessibility statement